At first glance, seems larger because its base is . The calmer way to compare it is to put both expressions over the same base:
The factor changes the scale of the exponent, but not its polynomial degree. The expression still lives on a cubic exponent.
When the constants move
Now compare with using Big-O notation. Both mention the same cubic scale, but the sits in a different place:
Here . The first notation allows the exponent itself to be rescaled; the second only multiplies the finished exponential.
Take . It satisfies
but
so . See the limit-form definition of Big-O notation.
Here is the same separation as a picture. Literal exponentials become enormous quickly, so the vertical axis shows . Take as a representative of the outside- form and as a representative of the inside- form.
The two notations are therefore not interchangeable. First normalise the base and inspect the exponent; then check where lives. The exponent tells you which terrain you are walking through, while the position of tells you how wide the path may be.